|

Translation of Malik's Muwatta, Book 41:
The Mudabbar
Courtesy of ISL
Software, makers of the WinAlim
Islamic database.
Section: Stoning
Book 41, Number 41.1.1:
Malik related to me from Nafi that Abdullah ibn Umar said, "The Jews
came to the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace,
and mentioned to him that a man and woman from among them had committed
adultery. The Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him
peace, asked them, 'What do you find in the Torah about stoning?' They
said, 'We make their wrong action known and flog them.' Abdullah ibn
Salam said, 'You have lied! It has stoning for it, so bring the Torah.'
They spread it out and one of them placed his hand over the ayat of
stoning. Then he read what was before it and what was after it. Abdullah
ibn Salam told him to lift his hand. He lifted his hand and there was
the ayat of stoning. They said, 'He has spoken the truth, Muhammad.
The ayat of stoning is in it.' So the Messenger of Allah, may Allah
bless him and grant him peace, gave the order and they were stoned .
"
Abdullah ibn Umar added, "I saw the man leaning over the woman to
protect her from the stones."
Malik commented, "By leaning he meant throwing himself over her so
that the stones fell on him."
Book 41, Number 41.1.2:
Malik related to me from Yahya ibn Said from Said ibn al-Musayyab
that a man from the Aslam tribe came to Abu Bakr as-Siddiq and said
to him, "I have committed adultery." Abu Bakr said to him, "Have you
mentioned this to anyone else?" He said, "No." Abu Bakr said to him,
"Then cover it up with the veil of Allah. Allah accepts tawba from his
slaves." His self was still unsettled, so he went to Umar ibn al-Khattab.
He told him the same as he had said to Abu Bakr, and Umar told him the
same as Abu Bakr had said to him. His self was still not settled so
he went to the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him
peace, and said to him, "I have committed adultery," insistently. The
Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, turned
away from him three times. Each time the Messenger of Allah, may Allah
bless him and grant him peace, turned away from him until it became
too much. The Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him
peace, questioned his family, "Does he have an illness which affects
his mind, or is he mad?" They said, "Messenger of Allah, by Allah, he
is well." The Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him
peace, said, "Unmarried or married?" They said, "Married, Messenger
of Allah." The Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him
peace, gave the order and he was stoned.
Book 41, Number 41.1.3:
Malik related to me from Yahya ibn Said that Said ibn al-Musayyab
said, "I have heard that the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him
and grant him peace, said to a man from the Aslam tribe called Hazzal,
'Hazzal, had you veiled him with your cloak, it would have been better
for you.' "
Yahya ibn Said said, "I related this hadith in an assembly among whom
was Yazid ibn Nuaym ibn Hazzal al-Aslami. Yazid said, 'Hazzal was my
grandfather. This hadith is true.' "
Book 41, Number 41.1.4:
Malik related to me that Ibn Shihab informed him that a man confessed
that he had committed adultery in the time of the Messenger of Allah,
may Allah bless him and grant him peace, and he testified against himself
four times, so the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant
him peace, gave the order and he was stoned.
Ibn Shihab said, "Because of this a man is to be taken for his own
confession against himself."
Book 41, Number 41.1.5:
Malik related to me from Yaqub ibn Zayd ibn Talha from his father
Zayd ibn Talha that Abdullah ibn Abi Mulayka informed him that a woman
came to the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace,
and informed him that she had committed adultery and was pregnant. The
Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, said to
her, "Go away until you give birth." When she had given birth, she came
to him. The Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace,
said to her, "Go away until you have suckled and weaned the baby." When
she had weaned the baby, she came to him. He said, "Go and entrust the
baby to someone." She entrusted the baby to someone and then came to
him. He gave the order and she was stoned.
Book 41, Number 41.1.6:
Malik related to me from Ibn Shihab from Ubaydullah ibn Abdullah ibn
Utba ibn Masud that Abu Hurayra and Zayd ibn Khalid al-Juhani informed
him that two men brought a dispute to the Messenger of Allah, may Allah
bless him and grant him peace. One of them said, "Messenger of Allah!
Judge between us by the Book of Allah!" The other said, and he was the
wiser of the two, "Yes, Messenger of Allah. Judge between us by the
Book of Allah and give me permission to speak." He said, "Speak." He
said, "My son was hired by this person and he committed fornication
with his wife. He told me that my son deserved stoning, and I ransomed
him for one hundred sheep and a slave-girl. Then I asked the people
of knowledge and they told me that my son deserved to be flogged with
one hundred lashes and exiled for a year, and they informed me that
the woman deserved to be stoned." The Messenger of Allah, may Allah
bless him and grant him peace, said, "By him in whose Hand myself is,
I will judge between you by the Book of Allah. As for your sheep and
slave girl, they should be returned to you. Your son should have one
hundred lashes and be exiled for a year." He ordered Unays al-Aslami
to go to the wife of the other man and to stone her if she confessed
. She confessed and he stoned her.
Book 41, Number 41.1.7:
Malik related to me from Suhayl ibn Abi Salih from his father from
Abu Hurayra that Sad ibn Ubada said to the Messenger of Allah, may Allah
bless him and grant him peace, "What do you think I should do if I were
to find a man with my wife? Should I leave him there until I had brought
four witnesses?" The Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant
him peace, said, "Yes."
Book 41, Number 41.1.8:
Malik related to me from Ibn Shihab from Ubaydullah ibn Abdullah ibn
Utba ibn Masud that Abdullah ibn Abbas said, "I heard Umar ibn al-Khattab
say, 'Stoning is in the Book of Allah for those who commit adultery,
men or women when they are muhsan and when there is clear proof of pregnancy
or a confession.' "
Book 41, Number 41.1.9:
Malik related to me from Yahya ibn Said from Sulayman ibn Yasar from
Abu Waqid al-Laythi that a man came to Umar ibn al-Khattab while he
was in ash-Sham . He mentioned to him that he had found a man with his
wife Umar sent Abu Waqid al-Laythi to the wife to question her about
that. He came to her while there were women around her and mentioned
to her what her husband had mentioned to Umar ibn al-Khattab, and informed
her that she would not be punished on his word and began to suggest
to her by that, that she should retract. She refused to retract and
held firm to confession. Umar gave the order and she was stoned.
Book 41, Number 41.1.10:
Malik related to me that Yahya ibn Said heard Said ibn al-Musayyab
say, "When Umar ibn al-Khattab came from Mina, he made his camel kneel
at al-Abtah, and then he gathered a pile of small stones and cast his
cloak over them and dropped to the ground. Then he raised his hands
to the sky and said, 'O Allah! I have become old and my strength has
weakened. My flock is scattered. Take me to You with nothing missed
out and without having neglected anything.' Then he went to Madina and
addressed the people. He said, 'People! Sunan have been laid down for
you. Obligations have been placed upon you. You have been left with
a clear way unless you lead people astray right and left.' He struck
one of his hands on the other and then said, 'Take care lest you destroy
the ayat of stoning so that one will say, "We do not find two hadds
in the Book of Allah." The Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and
grant him peace, stoned, so we have stoned. By He in Whose Hand my self
is, had it not been that people would say that Umar ibn al-Khattab has
added to the Book of Allah ta-ala, we would have written it, "The full-grown
man and the full-grown woman, stone them absolutely." We have certainly
recited that.'"
Malik said, "Yahya ibn Said said Said ibn al-Musayyab said, 'Dhu'l-Hijja
had not passed before Umar was murdered, may Allah have mercy on him.'
"
Yahya said that he had heard Malik say, "As for his words 'The full-grown
man and the full-grown woman' he meant, 'The man and the woman who have
been married, stone them absolutely.' "
Book 41, Number 41.1.11:
Malik related to me that he had heard that Uthman ibn Affan was brought
a woman who had given birth after six months and he ordered her to be
stoned. Ali ibn Abi Talib said to him, "She does not deserve that. Allah,
the Blessed, the Exalted, says in His Book, 'Their carrying and weaning
is thirty months,' (Sura 46 ayat 15) and he said, 'Mothers suckle their
children for two full years for whoever wishes to complete the suckling.'
(Sura 2 ayat 233) Pregnancy can then be six months, so she does not
deserve to be stoned." Uthman ibn Affan sent for her and found that
she had already been stoned.
Malik related to me that he asked Ibn Shihab about someone who committed
sodomy. Ibn Shihab said, "He is to be stoned, whether or not he is muhsan."
Section: Self-Confession of Fornication
Book 41, Number 41.2.12:
Malik related to me from Zayd ibn Aslam that a man confessed to fornication
in the time of the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant
him peace. The Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him
peace, called for a whip, and he was brought a broken whip. He said,
"Above this," and he was brought a new whip whose knots had not been
cut yet. He said, "Below this," and he was brought a whip which had
been used and made flexible. The Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless
him and grant him peace, gave the order and he was flogged. Then he
said, "People! The time has come for you to observe the limits of Allah.
Whoever has had any of these ugly things befall him should cover them
up with the veil of Allah. Whoever reveals to us his wrong action, we
perform what is in the Book of Allah against him."
Book 41, Number 41.2.13:
Malik related to me from Nafi that Safiyya bint Abi Ubayd informed
him that a man who had had intercourse with a virgin slave-girl and
made her pregnant was brought to Abu Bakr as-Siddiq. He confessed to
fornication, and he was not muhsan. Abu Bakr gave the order and he was
flogged with the hadd punishment. Then he was banished to Fadak, (thirty
miles from Madina).
Malik spoke about a person who confessed to fornication and then retracted
it and said, "I didn't do it. I said that for such-and-such a reason,"
and he mentioned the reason. Malik said, "That is accepted from him
and the hadd is not imposed on him. That is because the hadd is what
is for Allah, and it is only applied by one of two means, either by
a clear proof which establishes guilt or by a confession which is persisted
in so that the hadd is imposed. If someone persists in his confession,
the hadd is imposed on him."
Malik said, "I have not seen the people of knowledge exiling slaves
who have committed adultery."
Section: The Hadd for Fornication
Book 41, Number 41.3.14:
Malik related to me from Ibn Shihab from Ubaydullah ibn Abdullah ibn
Utba ibn Masud from Abu Hurayra and Zayd ibn Khalid al-Juhani that the
Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, was asked
about a slave-girl who committed fornication and was not muhsana. He
said, "If she commits fornication, then flog her. If she commits fornication
again, then flog her, and if she commits fornication again, then sell
her, if only for a rope."
Ibn Shihab added, "I don't know whether it was three or four times."
Book 41, Number 41.3.15:
Malik related to me from Nafi that a slave was in charge of the slaves
in the khumus and he forced a slave-girl among those slaves against
her will and had intercourse with her. Umar ibn al-Khattab had him flogged
and banished him, and he did not flog the slave-girl because the slave
had forced her.
Book 41, Number 41.3.16:
Malik related to me from Yahya ibn Said that Sulayman ibn Yasar informed
him that Abdullah ibn Abbas ibn Abi Rabia al-Makhzumi said, "Umar ibn
al-Khattab gave me orders about the slaves of Quraysh and we flogged
some of the slave-girls of the muslim lands fifty times each for fornication."
Section: Rape
Book 41, Number 41.4.16a:
Malik said, "The position with us about a woman who is found to be
pregnant and has no husband and she says, 'I was forced,' or she says,
'I was married,' is that it is not accepted from her and the hadd is
inflicted on her unless she has a clear proof of what she claims about
the marriage or that she was forced or she comes bleeding if she was
a virgin or she calls out for help so that someone comes to her and
she is in that state or what resembles it of the situation in which
the violation occurred." He said, "If she does not produce any of those,
the hadd is inflicted on her and what she claims of that is not accepted
from her."
Malik said, "A raped woman cannot marry until she has restored herself
by three menstrual periods."
He said, "If she doubts her periods, she does not marry until she
has freed herself of that doubt."
Section: The Hadd for Slander, Denial and Insinuation
Book 41, Number 41.5.17:
Malik related to me from Abu'z-Zinad that he said, ''Umar ibn Abd
al-Aziz flogged a slave with eighty lashes for slander."
Abu'z-Zinad said, "I asked Abdullah ibn Amir ibn Rabia about that.
He said, 'I saw Umar ibn al-Khattab, Uthman ibn Affan, the Khalifs,
and so on, and I did not see any of them flog a slave more than forty
lashes for slander.' "
Book 41, Number 41.5.18:
Malik related to me from Zurayq ibn Hakim al-Ayli that a man called
Misbah asked his son for help and he thought him unnecessarily slow.
When the son came, his father said to him, "O fornicator." Zurayq said,
"So the son asked me to help him against the father. When I wanted to
flog him, his son said, 'By Allah, if you flog him, I will acknowledge
that I have committed fornication.' When he said that, the situation
was confused for me, so I wrote about it to Umar ibn Abd al-Aziz who
was the governor at that time, and I mentioned it to him. Umar wrote
me to permit his pardon."
Zurayq said, "I wrote to Umar ibn Abd al-Aziz also, 'What do you think
about a man who is slandered or his parents are slandered and both or
only one of them are dead?' He said, Umar wrote to me, 'If he forgives,
his pardon is permitted for himself. If his parents are slandered and
one or both of them are dead, take the judgement of the Book of Allah
for it unless he wants to veil it.' "
Yahya said, "I heard Malik say, 'That is because the slandered man
might fear that if that is unveiled about him, a clear proof might be
established. If it is according to what we have described, his pardon
is permitted."
Book 41, Number 41.5.19:
Malik related to me from Hisham ibn Urwa that his father said that
there was only one hadd against a man who slandered a group of people.
Malik said, "If they are on separate occasions there is still only
one hadd against him."
Malik related to me from Abu'r-Rijal Muhammad ibn Abd ar-Rahman ibn
Haritha ibn an-Numan al-Ansari, then from the Banu'n-Najar from his
mother Amra bint Abd ar-Rahman that two men cursed each other in the
time of Umar ibn al-Khattab. One of them said to the other, " By Allah,
my father is not an adulterer and my mother is not an adulteress." Umar
ibn al-Khattab asked advice about that. One person said, "He has praised
his father and mother." Another said, "His father and mother have praise
other than this. We think that he is to be flogged with the hadd." So
Umar flogged him with the hadd of eighty lashes.
Malik said, "There is no hadd in our view except for slander, denial
or insinuation, in which one sees that the speaker intends by that denial
or slander. Then the hadd is completely imposed on the one who said
it."
Malik said, "What is done in our community when a man denies that
another man is from his father, is that he deserves the hadd. If the
mother who is denied is a slave, then he deserves the hadd as well.
'
Section: What has No Hadd for It
Book 41, Number 41.6.19a:
Malik said, "The best of what is heard about a slave-girl whom a man
has intercourse with while he has a partner in her is that the hadd
is not inflicted on him and the child is connected to him. When the
slave-girl becomes pregnant, her value is estimated and he gives his
partners their shares of the price and the slave-girl is his. That is
what is done among us."
Malik said about a man who made his slave-girl halal to a man that
if the one for whom she was made halal had intercourse with her, her
value was estimated on the day he had intercourse with her and he owed
that to her owner whether or not she conceived. The hadd was averted
from him by that. If she conceived the child was connected to him.
Malik said about a man who had intercourse with his son's or daughter's
slave-girl, "The hadd is averted from him and he owes the estimated
value of the slave-girl whether or not she conceives."
Book 41, Number 41.6.20:
Malik related to me from Rabia ibn Abi Abd ar-Rahman that Umar ibn
al-Khattab spoke about a man who went out with his wife's slave-girl
on a journey and had intercourse with her and then the wife became jealous
and mentioned that to Umar ibn al-Khattab. Umar questioned him about
it. He said, "She gave her to me." Umar said, "Bring me a clear proof
or I will stone you." Rabia added, "The wife confessed that she had
given her to him."
Section: What Obliges Cutting Off the Hand
Book 41, Number 41.7.21:
Malik related to me from Nafi from Abdullah ibn Umar that the Messenger
of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, cut off the hand
of a man who stole a shield whose price was three dirhams.
Book 41, Number 41.7.22:
Yahya related to me from Malik from Abdullah ibn Abd ar-Rahman abu
Husayn al-Makki that the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and
grant him peace, said, "The hand is not cut off for fruit hanging on
the tree and for sheep kept in the mountains. So when they are taken
from the fold or the place where the fruit is dried, a hand is cut off
for whatever reaches the price of a shield."
Book 41, Number 41.7.23:
Yahya related to me from Malik from Abdullah ibn Abi Bakr from his
father from Amra bint Abd ar-Rahman that a thief stole a citron in the
time of Uthman Uthman ibn Affan ordered its value to be estimated and
it was estimated at three dirhams at the rate of exchange of twelve
dirhams for the dinar, so Uthman cut off his hand.
Book 41, Number 41.7.24:
Yahya related to me from Malik from Yahya ibn Said from Amra bint
Abd ar-Rahman that A'isha, the wife of the Prophet, may Allah bless
him and grant him peace, said, "It has not been a long time for me and
I have not forgotten. A thief's hand is cut off for a quarter of a dinar
and upwards."
Book 41, Number 41.7.25:
Yahya related to me from Malik from Abdullah ibn Abi Bakr ibn Hazim
that Amra bint Abd ar-Rahman said, "A'isha, the wife of the Prophet,
may Allah bless him and grant him peace, went out to Makka and she had
two girl mawlas of hers and a slave belonging to the sons of Abdullah
ibn Abi Bakr as-Siddiq . She sent a figured cloak with the two mawlas
which was sewn up in a piece of green cloth."
Amra continued, "The slave took it and unstitched it and took out
the cloak. In its place, he put some felt or skin and sewed it up again.
When the mawla girls came to Madina, they gave it to his people. When
they opened it, they found felt in it and did not find the cloak. They
spoke to the two women and they spoke to A'isha, the wife of the Prophet,
may Allah bless him and grant him peace, or they wrote to her and suspected
the slave. The slave was asked about it and confessed. A'isha, the wife
of the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, gave the order
and his hand was cut off. A'isha said, 'A thief's hand is cut off for
a quarter of a dinar and upwards.' "
Malik said, "The limit I prefer above which cutting off the hand is
obliged is three dirhams, whether the exchange is high or low. That
is because the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him
peace, cut off the hand of a thief for a shield whose value was three
dirhams, and Uthman ibn Affan cut off the hand of a thief for a citron
which was estimated at three dirhams. This is what I prefer of what
I have heard on the matter."
Section: Cutting Off the Hands of Runaway Slaves Who Steal
Book 41, Number 41.8.26:
Yahya related to me from Malik from Nafi that a slave of Abdullah
ibn Umar stole while he was a runaway. Abdullah ibn Umar sent him to
Said ibn al-As, who was the amir of Madina, to cut off his hand. Said
refused to cut off his hand. He said, "The hand of a runaway slave is
not cut off when he steals." Abdullah ibn Umar said to him, "In what
Book of Allah did you find this?" Then Abdullah ibn Umar gave the order,
and his hand was cut off.
Book 41, Number 41.8.27:
Yahya related to me from Malik that Zurayq ibn Hakim informed him
that he had a runaway slave who had stolen. He said, "The situation
was obscure for me, so I wrote to Umar ibn Abd al-Aziz to ask him about
it. He was the governor at that time. I informed him that I had heard
that if a runaway slave stole while he was a fugitive, his hand was
not cut off. 'Umar ibn Abd al-Aziz wrote to contradict my letter, 'You
wrote to me that you have heard that when the runaway slave steals,
his hand is not cut off. Allah, the Blessed, the Exalted, says in His
Book, 'The thief, male and female, cut off the hands of both, as a recompense
for what they have earned, and an exemplary punishment from Allah. Allah
is Mighty, Wise.' (Sura 5 ayat 41) When his theft reaches a quarter
of a dinar, and upwards, his hand is cut off.' "
Yahya related to me from Malik that he had heard that al-Qasim ibn
Muhammad and Salim ibn Abdullah and Urwa ibn az-Zubayr said, "When a
runaway slave steals something for which cutting off the hand is obliged,
his hand is cut off."
Malik said, "The way of doing things amongst us about which there
is no dispute is that when the runaway slave steals that for which cutting
off the hand is obliged, his hand is cut off."
Section: Intercession Cut Off for Thieves when Cases Reach the Sultan
Book 41, Number 41.9.28:
Yahya related to me from Malik from Ibn Shihab from Safwan ibn Abdullah
ibn Safwan that it was said to Safwan ibn Umayya, "Whoever does not
do hijra is ruined." So Safwan ibn Umayya went to Madina and slept in
the mosque with his cloak as a pillow. A thief came and took his cloak
and Safwan grabbed hold of the thief and brought him to the Messenger
of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace. The Messenger of
Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, said to him, "Did you
steal this cloak?" He said, "Yes." So the Messenger of Allah, may Allah
bless him and grant him peace, ordered that his hand be cut off. Safwan
said to him, "I did not intend this. It is his as sadaqa." The Messenger
of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, said, "Why didn't
you do it before bringing him to me?"
Book 41, Number 41.9.29:
Yahya related to me from Malik from Rabia ibn Abi Abd ar-Rahman that
az-Zubayr ibn al-Awwam came across a man who had taken hold of a thief
and was intending to take him to the Sultan. Az-Zubayr ibn al-Awwam
interceded for him to let him go. He said, "No. Not until I take him
to the Sultan." Az-Zubayr said, "When you reach the Sultan with him,
Allah curses the one who intercedes and the one who accepts the intercession."
Section: General Section on Cutting Off the Hand
Book 41, Number 41.10.30:
Yahya related to me from Malik from Abd ar-Rahman ibn al-Qasim from
his father that a man from Yemen who had his hand and foot cut off came
and went before Abu Bakr as-Siddiq and complained to him that the governor
of the Yemen had wronged him, and the man used to pray part of the night.
Abu Bakr said, "By your father, your night is not the night of a thief."
Then they missed a necklace of Asma bint Umays, the wife of Abu Bakr
as-Siddiq. The man came to go around with them looking for it. He said,
"O Allah! You are responsible for the one who invaded the people of
this good house by night!" They found the jewelry with a goldsmith.
He claimed that the maimed man had brought it to him. The maimed man
confessed or it was testified against him. Abu Bakr as-Siddiq ordered
that his left hand be cut off. Abu Bakr said, "By Allah! His dua against
himself is more serious, as far as I am concerned, than his theft."
Yahya said that Malik said, "What is done among us about the person
who steals several times and is then called to reckoning, is that only
his hand is cut off for all he stole when the hadd has not been applied
againsthim. If the hadd has been applied against him before that, and
he steals what obliges cutting off, then the next limb is cut off."
Book 41, Number 41.10.31:
Yahya related to me from Malik that Abu'z-Zinad informed him that
a governor of Umar ibn Abd al-Aziz took some people in battle and had
not killed any of them. He wanted to cut off their hands or kill them,
so he wrote to Umar ibn Abd al-Aziz about that Umar ibn Abd al-Aziz
wrote to him, "Better to take less than that."
Yahya said that he heard Malik say, "What is done among us about a
person who steals the goods of people which are placed under guard in
the markets, and their owners put them in their containers and store
them together is that if anyone steals any of that from where it is
kept, and its value reaches that for which cutting off the hand is obliged,
his hand must be cut off, whether or not the owner of the goods is with
his goods and whether it is night or day."
Malik said about some one who stole something for which cutting off
the hand was obliged and then what he stole was found with him and he
returned it to its owner, "His hand is cut off."
Malik said, "If someon says, 'How can his hand be cut off when the
goods have been taken from him and returned to their owner?', it is
because he is in the same position as the wine drinker when the smell
of the wine is found on his breath and he is not drunk. He is flogged
with the hadd.
"The hadd is imposed for drinking wine even if it does not make the
man intoxicated. That is because he drank it to become intoxicated.
It is the same as that with cutting off the hand of the thief for theft
when it is taken from him, even if he has not profited from it and it
was returned to its owner. When he stole it, he stole it to take it
away."
Malik said that if some people came to a house and robbed it together,
and then they left with a sack or box or a board or basket or the like
of that which they carried together, and when they took it out of its
guarded place, they carried it together, and the price of what they
took reached that for which cutting off the hand was obliged, and that
was three dirhams and upwards, each of them had his hand cut off.
"If each of them takes out something by himself, whoever of them takes
out something whose value reaches three dirhams and upwards must have
his hand cut off. If any of them takes out something whose value does
not reach three dirhams, he does not have his hand cut off."
Yahya said that Malik said, "What is done among us is that when a
man's house is locked and he is the only one living in it, cutting off
the hand is not obliged against the one who steals something from it
until he takes it out of the house completely. That is because all of
the house is a place of custody. If someone other than him lives in
the house and each of them locks his door, and it is a place of custody
for each of them, whoever steals anything from the apartments of that
house must have his hand cut off when he leaves the apartment and goes
into the main house. He has removed it from its place of custody to
another place and he must have his hand cut off."
Malik said, "What is done in our community about a slave who steals
from the property of his master is that if he is not in service and
among those trusted in the house and he enters secretly and steals from
his master something that for which cutting off the hand is obliged,
his hand is not cut off. It is like that with a slave-girl when she
steals from her master's property. Her hand is not cut off."
Malik then spoke about a slave who was not in service and not one
of those trusted in the house, and he entered secretly and stole from
the property of his master's wife that for which cutting off the hand
was obliged. He said, "His hand is cut off."
"It is like that with the wife's slave-girl when she does not serve
her or her husband nor is she trusted in the house and she enters secretly
and steals from her mistress's property that for which cutting off the
hand is obliged. Her hand is not cut off."
"It is like that with the wife's slave-girl who is not in her service
and is not trusted in the house and she enters secretly and steals from
the property of her mistress's husband something for which cutting off
the hand is obliged. Her hand is cut off."
It is like that with the man who steals from his wife's goods or the
wife who steals from her husband's goods something for which cutting
off the hand is obliged. If the thing which one of them steals from
his spouse's property is in a room other than the room which they both
lock for themselves, or it is in a place of custody in a room other
than the room which they are in, whichever of them steals something
for which cutting off the hand is obliged, their hand should be cut
off."
Malik spoke about a small child and a foreigner who does not speak
clearly. He said, "If they are robbed of something from its place of
custody or from under a lock, the one who stole it has his hand cut
off. If the property is outside of its place of custody or locked room(when
it is stolen), the one who robbed them does not have his hand cut off.
It is then in the position of sheep stolen from the mountain and uncut
fruit hanging on the trees "
Malik said, "What is done among us about a person who robs graves
is that if what he takes from the grave reaches what cutting off the
hand is obliged for, his hand is cut off . That is because the grave
is a place of custody for what is in it just as houses are a place of
custody for what is in them. "
Malik added, "Cutting off the hand is not obliged for him until he
takes it out of the grave."
Section: Things for Which the Hand is Not Cut Off
Book 41, Number 41.11.32:
Yahya related to me from Malik from Yahya ibn Said from Muhammad ibn
Yahya ibn Habban that a slave stole a small palm from a man's garden
and planted it in the garden of his master. The owner of the palm went
out looking for the palm and found it. He asked for help against the
slave from Marwan ibn al-Hakam. Marwan jailed the slave and wanted to
cut off his hand. The master of the slave rushed off to Rafi ibn Khadij
and asked him about it. Rafi informed him that he heard the Messenger
of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, say, "The hand is
not cut off for fruit or palm pith." The man said, "Marwan ibn al-Hakam
has taken a slave of mine and wants to cut off his hand. I would like
you to go with me to him so you can tell him what you heard from the
Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace." So, Rafi
went with him to Marwan ibn al-Hakam. He said, "Did you arrest a slave
for this?" He said, "Yes." He said, "What will you do with him?" He
said, "I want to cut off his hand." Rafi said to him, "I heard the Messenger
of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, say, 'The hand is
not cut off for dates or palm pith.' Marwan therefore ordered the slave
to be released."
Book 41, Number 41.11.33:
Yahya related to me from Malik from Ibn Shihab from as-Sa'ib ibn Yazid
that Abdullah ibn Amr ibn al-Hadrami brought a slave of his to Umar
ibn al-Khattab and said to him, "Cut off the hand of this slave of mine.
He has stolen." Umar said to him, "What did he steal?" He said, "He
stole a mirror belonging to my wife. Its value was sixty dirhams." Umar
said, "Let him go. His hand is not to be cut off. He is your servant
who has stolen your belongings."
Book 41, Number 41.11.34:
Yahya related to me from Malik from Ibn Shihab that Marwan ibn al-Hakam
was brought a man who had snatched some goods and he wanted to cut off
his hand. He sent to Zayd ibn Thabit to ask him about it. Zayd ibn Thabit
said to him, "The hand is not cut off for what is stolen by chance,
openly, in haste."
Book 41, Number 41.11.35:
Yahya related to me from Malik that Yahya ibn Said said that Abu Bakr
ibn Muhammad ibn Amr ibn Hazm informed him that he had taken a Nabatean
who had stolen some iron rings and jailed him in order to cut off his
hand. Amra bint Abd ar-Rahman sent a girl mawla to him called Umayya.
Abu Bakr said that she had come to him while he was among the people
and said that his aunt Amra sent word to him saying, "Son of my brother!
You have taken a Nabatean for something insignificant which was mentioned
to me. Do you want to cut off his hand?" He had said, "Yes." She said,
''Amra says to you not to cut off the hand except for a quarter of a
dinar and upwards."
Abu Bakr added, "So I let the Nabatean go."
Malik said, "The generally agreed on way of doing things among us
about the confession of slaves is that if a slave confesses something
against himself, the hadd and punishment for it is inflicted on his
body. His confession is accepted from him and one does not suspect that
he would inflict something on himself."
Malik said, "As for the one of them who confesses to a matter which
will incur damages agains this master, his confession is not accepted
against his master."
Malik said, "One does not cut off the hand of a hireling or a man
who is with some people to serve them, if he robs them, because his
state is not the state of a thief. His state is the state of a treacherous
one. The treacherous one does not have his hand cut off."
Malik said about a person who borrows something and then denies it,
"His hand is not cut off. He is like a man who owes a debt to another
man and denies it. He does not have his hand cut off for what he has
denied."
Malik said, "The generally agreed-on way of dealing among us, with
the thief who is found in a house and has gathered up goods and has
not taken them out, is that his hand is not cut off. That is like the
man who places wine before him to drink it and does not do it. The hadd
is not imposed on him. That is like a man who sits with a woman and
desires to have haram intercourse with her and does not do it and he
does not reach her. There is no hadd against that either."
Malik said, "The generally agreed-on way of doing things among us
is that there is no cutting off the hand for what is taken by chance,
openly and in haste, whether or not its price reaches that for which
the hand is cut off."
|